In some of my recent articles, I’ve discussed lottery strategies that utilize the bell-shaped challenge performance of some lottery characteristics. Many such shape are used by lottery players to improve their odds of winning the lottery jackpot. As with all of my articles, I was hoping to promote some response. Well, I got that. But, in the process, it seems that I have caused a pandemonium about lottery jackpots.
It makes my day when lottery players get enthusiastic about the best topic. Their excitement makes my day. I don’t mind controversy, in fact, I like it. It is grist for my writing work. But, in this case, it seems that I stirred up a hornets’ nesting. So, in the interests of civility, a sanitized version of their complaints looks a product like this:
Bell designed shape may be great but lottery jackpots don’t behave like that!
Lo Contrario Me Amigo
There is no way to put this nicely. My lottery critics are wrong absolutely and toto 88 across the board. All lotteries follow these bell-shaped distributions, both the theory is that and, I state most emphatically, in practice! And, a lottery number analysis performed on any lottery would prove my point. I hope that makes my position on the subject clear enough for everyone.
Now, you want me to back up what I have said. No worries. If you were here with me within my computer, I would make my case by playing one of the best games. I would start off by saying a product like this “Go ahead and pick any lottery you want. inches Then, I would start working on use my lottery software program to prove, that when it comes to lottery jackpots, I am close to the money.
This is how it would go. First, you would pick any lottery you choose. Second, you would select a performance characteristic that interests you. Next I would display the theoretical bell-shaped challenge of the particular performance characteristic. This would be an example of one of the very graphs that some of you are objecting to. Finally, I would show you the same graph depicting what actually happened using the actual winning lottery jackpot numbers.
For example, let’s say you chose the Florida Lotto. Shortly, you would have been looking at the theoretical challenge for the last 372 paintings (over 3 1/2 years). Next, I would have shown you the same challenge of the winning lottery jackpot numbers. Surprise, surprise; a bell-shaped challenge. What happened over the 372 paintings history is strictly what theory expected. In this case, both graphs would fit like a hand and handwear cover.
Shocked? Don’t believe me? Do you think this is some sort of restaurant game? Or are you not really impressed and have decided to dig in your heals and stick to your guns. After all, this could simply be an anomaly. Fine. We’ll do it again. OK, you choose.
This round you choose the Hugely Millions lottery. Again, I show you the theoretical and the actual graphs for the last 372 paintings. Surprise! Again, the graphs are the same.
Still can’t believe what you’re seeing? No? OK, proceed to pick one more lottery. Then, the new York Lotto it is. Well, what do you know. The graphs are a match. The lottery jackpot results will always match the estimations of the theoretical distributions. I challenge anyone to produce an example where the theoretical and the winning lottery jackpot distributions don’t match.
So, where do all lottery jackpots hide? By now you should know, they are inside that bell-shaped challenge.